fbpx

12 – 16 January 2026

DOWNLOAD AS PDF >>

Weekly Trade Commentary

  • Last week saw only 3 stocks traded on the local market with a total trading value of K2,257,095.23.
  • BSP traded 87,656 shares, steady at K24.55.
  • KSL traded 149,348 shares, also steady at K3.81.
  • Lastly , STO managed to trade 7,669 shares changing hands steady at K18.50.

WEEKLY MARKET REPORT | 12 January, 2026 – 16 January, 2026

 

STOCK WEEKLY VOLUME
CLOSING PRICE VALUE BID OFFER CHANGE % CHANGE
BSP 87,656 24.55 112,758.15 24.55
 KSL 149,348 3.81 1,858,660.08 3.85
STO 7,669 18.50 285,677.00 18.50 22.00
NEM 181.00
KAM 1.92 1.95
NGP 1.35
CCP 4.60 5,798.10 4.62
CPL 0.65 248,395.60 0.60
SST 50.00 50.00
  244,673 TOTAL 2,257,095.23      

 

Key takeaways:

  • NEM – Form 3 as filed – David Thornton Download >>

  • NEM – Form 3 as filed – Mark Rodgers Download >>

  • NEM – Form 3 as filed – David Fry Download >>

  • Market Announcement: KAM – NTA as at 31 December 2025 Downlaod >>

  • Market Announcement: NEM – Fourth Quarter and FY 2025 Conference Call Downlaod >>

  • Market Announcement: STO – Unquoted securities Downlaod >>

    STO Notification of Cessation of Securities Download >>
    STO Notification of Issue Converions Download >>
    STO Notification of Cessation of Securities Download >>


 

WEEKLY YIELD CHART | 12 January, 2026 – 16 January, 2026

STOCK NUMBER ISSUED OF SHARES
MARKET CAP
2023 INTERIM DIV 2023 FINAL DIV 2024 INTERIM DIV 2024 FINAL DIV 2025 INTERIM DIV YIELD % LTM
BSP 467,219,979 11,470,250,484 K0.370 K1.060 K1.210 K1.210 K0.500 6.97%
 KSL 287,949,279 1,097,086,753 K0.100 K0.160 K0.106 K1.155 K0.126 7.38%
STO 3,247,772,961 60,083,799,779 K0.310 K0.660 k0.506 K0.414 K0.559 5.26%
NEM*
KAM 50,693,986 97,332,453 K0.120 K0.250 23.44%
NGP 45,890,700 61,952,445 K0.030 K0.120 K0.120 K0.040 11.85%
CCP 307,931,332 1,416,484,127 K0.110 K0.130 K0.121 K0.121 K0.121 5.26%
CPL 206,277,911 134,080,642 K0.050
SST 31,008,237 1,550,411,850 K0.350 K0.600 K0.300 K0.300 K0.400 1.40%
  TOTAL 75,911,398,533           5.49%

a LTM = Last Twelve Months. We have calculated yields based on most recently declared
interim and final dividends.
* NEM pays quarterly dividends. We have added last 4 payments at current FX rates.

Dividend yield – is calculated by dividing a company’s annual dividends per share by its current share price and expressing the result as a percentage.


BPNG

Domestic Markets Department – Money Markets Operations Unit

Auction Number:          14 JAN-26 / GOI / Government Treasury Bill

Settlement Date:         16-JAN-26

Amount on Offer: K350.000 million

 

TERMS

ISSUE ID
2025 / 63

ISSUE ID
2025 / 91

ISSUE ID
2025 / 4741 182

ISSUE ID
2025 /4700 273

ISSUE ID
2025 / 4743
364

TOTAL

Weighted Average Yield

0.000

0.00%

4.95%

5.11%

5.37%

 

Amount on offer Kina Million

0.000

0.000

30.000

70.000

250.000

350.000

Bids Received Kina Million

0.00

0.000

37.730

74.00

300.570

412.30

Successful Bids Kina Million

0.00

0.000

30.00

70.00

210.570

310.57

Overall Auction OVER-SUBSCRIBED by

0.00

0.000

7.730

4.00

50.570

62.30

 

 


 

 

What we have been reading

BELL POTTER AUSTRALIAN EQUITY CORE PORTFOLIO

December Monthly

Paul Basha • Strategist Evelyn Murdoch • Associate 
As of 5 December 2025

A TIME TO BE RESOURCEFUL
We are making a sector positioning shift in the Core Portfolio, moving overweight Resources and cutting Real Assets to Underweight. Rotating into Resources Our previous thesis for Real Assets was predicated on a view of continued rate cuts in 2026, but that trajectory is no longer a certainty. With a better-than-expected jobs print in mid-November and CPI data remaining uncomfortably hot, the direction of travel for monetary policy is becoming difficult to judge and it is no longer guaranteed that the next move is down. The overweight Real Assets positioning has worked successfully with our yield sensitive holdings and has outperformed the ASX200 over the past month. The immediate duration tailwind for the sector has faded however, and we are taking profits to redeploy.
 
That capital is rotating into Resources were we are in the early stages of an earnings upgrade cycle driven by supportive supply/demand dynamics for physical commodities. This pivot (and stock selection within) helps increase the EPS growth in the portfolio from 12.8% to 13.4% with the P/E lowering slightly from 20.6x to 20.3x. ROE also
increases to 17.3% from 16.6% and yield unchanged at 3%. We are higher than the market on growth (7.6%) though paying slightly more for it (12MF P/E for ASX200 at 17.9x).
 
 

 

The case for resources

We are seeing the first genuine resources upgrade cycle in three years, catalyzed by a shift in global macro conditions. Cyclical tailwinds supporting the resource sector:
Expected US interest rate cuts should stimulate global growth and act as a headwind for the US$. This expansionary monetary setting is interacting with tight physical markets, fostering a setup where scarcity pricing could significantly drive commodities and resource equities higher.
 
A weaker US$ provides further support to the sector, given that most commodities are priced in the currency.
 
A liquidity rally is building across key Asian markets as credit expands. We see a rising risk of further Chinese stimulus over the next 12-18 months. While a property rebound isn’t anticipated, increased support for the property sector to boost consumer sentiment, alongside greater infrastructure spending, should lift commodity demand.
Spot prices for key resource commodities (iron ore, copper, gold) are currently trading above consensus estimates, which is expected to maintain strong earnings momentum across the ASX resource sector.
 
At the same time, structural demand is rising, and these non-cyclical forces are raising the floor for the sector, for copper: 
 
Electrification / Data Centers: The AI trade is evolving into a physical infrastructure boom. Data centers are incredibly energy and copper-intensive, creating a new layer of base metal demand. The AI trade is just the tip of the spear. The broader story is the modernization of global power grids to support decarbonization and electric transport. This is a copper and aluminum intensive super-cycle that dwarfs the demand from data centers alone.
 
Strategic Re-Industrialisation: Western nations are no longer just consumers of goods but are rebuilding manufacturing capacity. From batteries to defense systems, the drive for domestic production capability (onshoring) is creating sustained, strategic demand for industrial metals independent of the broader business cycle.
 

Commodity thematics: A copper supercycle, and gold has more legs

Copper: The structural case for copper is compelling. The market has faced a series of significant supply disruptions over the last year, with major mines in Indonesia, the
Congo, and Chile all facing shutdowns or halts. This creates a major short-term production headwind.

This supply constraint is running into a significant step up in demand. The energy transition requires a massive build-out of power grids, and data centers are incredibly copper hungry, making the metal a “picks and shovels” play on the AI thematic. This is layered on top of traditional demand and the accelerating adoption of EVs, which use four times more copper than a combustion engine vehicle. This demand is emerging just as the supply side faces long-term challenges. Global copper head grades are in structural decline, and there has been a persistent fall in major new discoveries for over a decade.
 
Gold: We see the recent pullback in gold as a consolidation, not a bearish signal. The run-up past US$4,000/oz was extreme in pace, and pullbacks are healthy. The structural drivers that pushed gold to record highs remain firmly in place: persistent investor demand (both retail and central bank) as a hedge against US fiscal sustainability, ongoing geopolitical tensions, and concerns over debasement of fiat currencies.
 

Iron Ore: Prices remain above US$100/t, defying consensus calls for a collapse.

The market is prematurely pricing in a supply glut from Simandou coming alone that has yet to arrive, while ignoring the ongoing resilience of steel production rates. Copper and gold are our preferred exposures, supported by physical deficits that are keeping prices structurally elevated. While some forecast a ‘grind lower’ in 2026 as the US cycle turns, the long-term investment case remains intact. We also maintain a short-term positive view on iron ore. With spot prices holding above $100/t, the commodity continues to defy bearish forecasts. The upgrade thesis here doesn’t require prices to rally further; they simply need to hold above consensus decks to deliver value. 


Rio Tinto (RIO) – Pivoting to copper

We add Rio at a 4% weight (~2% active) into the Core portfolio. The thesis is driven by a structural pivot from iron ore to copper, with group copper production set to rise ~20% over the next three years as Oyu Tolgoi hits its stride and Escondida grades improve. This creates a clear path to ~1Mtpa of production, accompanied by a margin tailwind as unit costs benefit from strong gold and silver by-product credits. RIO offers valuable diversification through its aluminium & lithium division, providing leverage to a tightening physical market. 

The investment case is evolving into a story of simplification and higher-quality earnings. Management is focused on costs and is consolidating the business into three core profit centers: Iron Ore, Copper, and a combined Aluminium & Lithium division. With wage inflation running ahead of revenue – an area where peers like BHP have historically outperformed – reining in the cost base is a priority. They are also focused on portfolio optimization with the potential sale of non-core assets like borates and titanium dioxide as examples which could unlock ~$5-10bn of capital, providing capital to delever the balance sheet or boost shareholder returns.

This improved structure supports a fundamental shift in capital allocation. Even as Simandou volumes come online in late 2025, the relative dominance of the iron ore division is shrinking—forecast to drop from ~85% of EBITDA in FY23 to ~55% by FY26. We expect the majority of the growth capex budget to now target the Aluminium & Lithium space. The focus will likely be on bringing Rincon and the acquired Arcadium assets (Fenix, Sal De Vida, Nemaska) to market, while more complex projects like Jadar are potentially de-prioritised. 
 

Energy rotation

We are rotating out of Worley (WOR) and into Santos (STO) following mixed operational updates at WOR and a clearer inflection emerging in STO’s free-cash-flow and balance-sheet trajectory into FY26.

Selling Worley (WOR): WOR was initially our preferred energy-adjacent exposure, leveraged to both traditional and new-energy infrastructure. However, the recent AGM highlighted a softer near-term earnings profile, with above normal 1H:2H skew driven by restructuring charges, capability resets and isolated project cancellations. It additionally confirmed a slower than expected start to the year for global engineering awards as tariff uncertainty and cost inflation delay FID cycles. While contracting margins have generally behaved as expected, the risk/reward has deteriorated with consensus now baking in a deeper 2H skew. On valuation and earnings momentum, we think WOR’s catalysts are now more back-ended and less compelling relative to alternatives within the sector.
 
Buying Santos (STO): By contrast, Santos is looking relatively cheap after its sell-off and screens as the more attractive risk/reward exposure to energy STO is emerging from its peak capex phase, with Barossa LNG and the Pikka oil development approaching completion, and group capex set to decline materially post-2025. The ramp up of major projects and normalized capex spend supports stronger FCF yields and a faster decline in gearing, providing a cleaner translation of earnings into distributable cash.
The Comparison (STO vs WDS): Woodside sits at the opposite point in the cycle, with its commitment to the Louisiana LNG project, on top of ongoing spend at Scarborough and Trion, pushing group capex higher into FY26. This elevates execution risk and lifts its FCF breakeven oil price, with DPS and ROIC expected to step down for WDS in FY26, while STO grinds higher.

STO’s entry into a capex-lite phase, combined with lower execution complexity, makes it the cleaner and more attractive exposure at this point in the cycle.
 
 
Please feel free to reach out for your investment needs.

Regards,

JMP Securities Team

a. Level 3, ADF Haus, Musgrave St., Port Moresby NCD Papua New Guinea
p. PO Box 2064, Port Moresby NCD Papua New Guinea

Lars Mortensen

Managing Director

Email: lars.mortensen@jmpmarkets.com
Ph: +675 7200 2233
Mobile: +675 7056 5124

Nathan Chang

Head of Equity Capital Markets

Email: nathan.chang@jmpmarkets.com
Ph: +675 7167 3223
Mobile: +61 422 113 630

Leave a Reply